CorpsQuest Rubric

 

 

Basic ( 0 )

Competent ( 2 )

Proficient ( 4 )

Score

Frames the Essential Question

  • The question can be answered directly
  • The focus of the question is on the lower levels of Bloom's Taxonomy of knowledge and comprehension
  • The question has one obvious answer 
  • The question spans the lower levels of Bloom's Taxonomy of knowledge, comprehension and application;
  • The student is able to quickly reach a conclusion in response to the question
  • Does not attempt to have students make judgment or evaluation
  • The essential question scaffolds learning, spanning Bloom's Taxonomy
  • The learner is encouraged to wonder;
  • The learner is encouraged to invent his/her own solution
  • The essential question builds on prior knowledge
  • Raises relevant question
  • Question related to classroom curriculum

#

Follows Inquiry Process

  • Involves searching for information not focused on the ideas in the question
  • Asks questions
  • Learns information on the topic
  • Seek or create data that partially addresses the question
  • Use bits and pieces of information
  • States the conclusion
  • Seek or create data that addresses the question. Ask additional questions
  • Search the Information (data) for patterns
  • Find regularities in the information that address the relevant questions and draw conclusions
  • Reflect on the adequacy of the conclusion in terms of the quality of the information and the question.

#

Overall Visual Appeal

  • Only text
  • Uses one layout
  • Navigation depends on the "Back" button of the browser

 


 

  • Graphic elements sometimes, but not always, contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships.
  • There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.
  • There are a few places where the learner can get lost and not know where to go next.
  • Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships.
  • Differences in type size and/or color are used well and consistently.
  • Navigation is seamless. It is always clear to the learner what all the pieces are and how to get to them.

#

Connects Task to Academic Standards at developmentally appropriate grade level

  • CorpsQuest. lists multiple items from standards that are peripherally connected to the topic
  • Standards listed are not addressed by the CorpsQuest.
  • CorpsQuest. is not interdisciplinary; no effort is made to connect to other disciplines.
  • Standards are related to the CorpsQuest..
  • CorpsQuest. is interdisciplinary with clearly targeted standards
  • Standards are directly correlated to the tasks.
  • Standards are related to classroom curriculum

#

Engaging Scenario & Tasks 

  • The scenario is one-dimensional
  • The task requires a student to research at the knowledge or comprehension level
  • Assumes learner can plan his or her time without directions.
  • The scenario is interesting
  • The tasks are partially defined; some background information is supplied for each role
  • Directions are clear.
  • The scenario and task is engaging for students and elicits thinking in learners that goes beyond rote comprehension. 
  • The task provides sufficient background information to excite the interest of students
  • The procedures are clearly outlined.

#

Relevant sources at appropriate grade level for students and quality of resources 

  • Links to sites and materials somewhat connected to the assignment 
  • Uses one source
  • Interprets meaning from one source
  • LImited information for students to analyze or interpret
  • Information listed includes relevant and irrelevant materials
  • Uses a limited number of sources
  • Sites provide facts, but do not encourage reflection
  • Some sites are not developmentally inappropriate
  • All information listed is relevant information
  • Sources are differentiated for each role
  • Place meaning of the problem in personal, social or community perspectives
  • Sources are at an appropriate reading level for students

#

Roles are interesting and create dissonance

  • Students may create roles, but they are not defined.
  • Roles are general so action is guided by other factors.
  • Background information is the same for all characters; or there is one role in the CorpsQuest.
  • The characters are similar in belief or thought
  • There is insufficient background information
  • Their two or fewer roles
  • The character is clearly "invented" and would not be involved in the scenario in the real world
  • The CorpsQuest. introduces characters who would interact with the information in the "real world"
  • Uses several characters/roles that are clearly defined and unique.
  • Characters have different points of view on the subject

 

 

Clarity of Evaluation Criteria

  • A checklist of sections is provided without indicators of quality.
  • Teacher applies the rubric
  • Criteria for success are at partially described on a continuum of progress.
  • Students apply the rubric to their own work.
  • Criteria for success are clearly stated in the form of a rubric for teacher assessment, student self assessment and peer assessment.
  • Criteria include qualitative as well as quantitative descriptors.
  • The evaluation instrument clearly measures what students must know and be able to do to accomplish the task.

#

Creativity

  • Student copies and pastes from the Internet without discrimination
  • Product demonstrates little connection to the question 
  • Product does not show reflection. 
  • Student would be able to demonstrate one clear approach to understanding the problem
  • Does not ask students to draw conclusion.
  • Student would be able to generate multiple approaches of looking at the problem
  • Student would be challenge to demonstrate different approaches.

#

Total Score

 

 

 

#

This is a modified version of a CorpsQuest Rubric based on the original WebQuest rubric by Bernie Dodge. Modified first by Dennis Sunal and Valesca Dwyer, 2002 Modified further by the Hilarie Davis, 2/13/02 for the Re-Discovery Project